Life in The Simulation

If we accept the 3 conditions listed below then we can make a convincing case that it is far, far more likely that we live in a simulation universe rather than a ‘real’ universe.

  1. At some point in time in some universe or plane of existence somewhere, intelligent agent(s) of some kind developed to the point of being able to create simulation universes of very high sophistication (ex. Matrix).
  2. The simulation minds within the simulation universe are complex enough to become ‘conscious’ in the same way that we think we are conscious.
  3. The intelligent agent(s) at work create many of these simulations (maybe millions/billions+).

It should be noted that the term ‘universe’ is generally defined as ‘all existing matter and space considered as a whole.’ So when we are talking about multiple universes and simulation universes we are not talking about the literal definition of universe as anything and everything that there is. It might be the case that very many or even infinite number of real or simulation ‘universes’ exist but these are universes in the sense that they are closed systems/realities. An observer inside cannot experience anything whatsoever outside of their particular ‘universe’ system.

For condition #1 we should remember that since we can only experience events within our universe and time frame it is not relevant when, where, or by whom simulations are created. (It could even be the case that 100 years in the future on Earth we humans achieve this ability and then go on to simulate our history and civilization in full realism many times over. We might start from the point the Earth cooled and fast forward/rewind through the ages. The inhabitants in this scenario would feel like very normal people on Earth.) Or it might be the case that the creator(s) lives in a universe nothing at all like ours and created many simulations with varying conditions (laws of physics etc.) until they found something interesting.

For condition #2 it is difficult to say how likely it might be that ‘simulation people’ would experience true consciousness in the way that we think we do. The whole issue of consciousness and whether a machine or program in a simulation can achieve consciousness is uncertain. It might be the case that only biological beings can achieve consciousness or it might be that sufficient complexity and mind architecture is what matters.

In condition #3 we assume that an intelligence capable of creating simulation universes would not only do so but they would create many of them. I think this is a reasonable assumption. We should remember that we only need this to happen once. We only need 1 civilization or intelligent entity in all of existence to figure out how to create these simulations and they can then go on to create billions of them. It seems to me that a civilization advanced enough to create these simulations would not have to worry much about scarcity of resources or energy so then it would be very easy to create billions and billions of simulations rather than just a few.

So how does this suggest that we live in a simulation and not a real universe? For the sake simplicity let’s imagine that the average number of conscious ‘human’ inhabitants per simulation universe is 1 million. These inhabitants are ‘conscious’ and for all intents and purposes they are absolutely oblivious to the fact that they are in a simulation. They are just like us. If we have very many of these simulations, let’s say 1 million to be conservative, then the total number of simulation people across all simulations is 1 trillion. Now let’s imagine that the ‘mother’ universe has 10 billion real conscious inhabitants… So of all the minds across the real and the simulation universes only 1/100 of them are ‘real’. So if we are sitting here experiencing consciousness but with absolutely no way of being able to tell whether everything is ‘real’ or not we can only give ourselves odds: 1/100, probably not.


Further reading: Simulation Hypothesis (wiki page).

Footnote: Nick Bostrom (writer/philosopher at Oxford) comes to a similar conclusion in ‘Bostrom’s trilemma’:

“A technologically mature “posthuman” civilization would have enormous computing power. Based on this empirical fact, the simulation argument shows that at least one of the following propositions is true:

  1. The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage is very close to zero;
  2. The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero;
  3. The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one.

If (1) is true, then we will almost certainly go extinct before reaching posthumanity. If (2) is true, then there must be a strong convergence among the courses of advanced civilizations so that virtually none contains any relatively wealthy individuals who desire to run ancestor-simulations and are free to do so. If (3) is true, then we almost certainly live in a simulation. In the dark forest of our current ignorance, it seems sensible to apportion one’s credence roughly evenly between (1), (2), and (3).
Unless we are now living in a simulation, our descendants will almost certainly never run an ancestor-simulation.”

Bostrom not only presents a much simpler and more polished case for his conclusion than I have, but he also more clearly asserts that: either we (almost certainly) live in a simulation or such ‘ancestor-simulations’ just never get made.

UPDATE (Dec.11, 2012): Scientists at the University of Washington have set out to try and find the ‘signatures’ deep within physics that might tell us whether our universe is a simulation. Link.


7 thoughts on “Life in The Simulation

  1. Interesting information that I would like to learn more on, but I feel what you have here is a bit beyond my grasp. Could you publish it in a more elementary form?

    1. Well just imagine that in the future we have computers so advanced that we can create Matrix-like simulations. The simulations are so good that the people inside them think and feel like they are real people just like us. We then go on to create millions of simulations because it would be interesting to do so. So now we have a million ‘virtual Earths’ and only 1 real Earth.

      If there is no way to tell (from the inside) whether you were born into one of the millions of virtual worlds OR the 1 single real world then the best you do is give yourself odds. It is possible you live in the real, original world. But it is millions of times more likely that you live in one of many simulations.

      1. |Do you feel that we are possibly in a simulation now, or is that a step to come as the human race advances in technology?

        I’m not sure. My natural reaction is to say, ‘no, this is real.’ But there really is no way for us to know. There is no test that we could do (that I know of) that would tell us how ‘real’ our world is.

        I think that we most certainly will run simulations of Earth and the universe as soon as we can. We already do this with computer programs and video games and virtual reality etc. Our computers are just so primitive that we can barely simulate a drop of water hitting the ground never mind an entire planet. The amount of interesting data we could generate from matrix-like simulations would be absolutely mind blowing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s